Skins analysis
In image two there is only one character. He is completely pale white which helps his hair and eyes stand out, which are black/brown. The character looks quite suicidal; he is laying in a bath drowning himself in the water staring at the camera with a direct mode of address looking fairly unhealthy. The image is in low key lighting, with a washed out green effect throughout. The walls are dark and torn apart. Showing a scruffy, unhygienic side to himself. There are hardly any props in the room (soap, toothbrush etc.) which makes the character seem quite low class (poor) and represented quite ordinary.
The teenagers are represented as quite naive and vulnerable to each other. They seem to be quite promiscuous. It isn’t a realistic portrayal as not all teenagers are the same as the characters in the image. Most teenagers are similar to the young boy in image one next to the lampshade. As most teenagers are intimidated by celebrities which make them feel insecure about themselves. This image can be believable as some teenagers are very naive, which build them up a sexual representation. All teenagers have parties that destroy their house (image 1), and some teenagers even think about committing suicide (image 2), so the images could be plausible. I consider these two images to be a negative presentation of teenagers. They are being looked at as loose humans, that have insanitary houses. The different responses that the audience might make of these representations of teenagers could be, that they could be scared of teenagers, and that they seem very gullible and immature. Which isn’t true, as some teenagers are quite mature. Some teenagers could find these images quite offensive (also some parents may find it unpleasant). This is because of the way that the teenagers are being represented, not in a nice way.
No comments:
Post a Comment